Archive for the ‘trade-in values’ Category

Mark Gillies Talks to Shell’s Technology Manager Lisa Lilley About Formula1 Racing Fuel – Feature – Auto Reviews – Car and Driver

trade-in values | Posted by Belov
Sep 10 2011

Mark Gillies Talks to Shell's Technology Manager Lisa Lilley About Formula1 Racing Fuel - Feature - Auto Reviews - Car and Driver

Lisa Lilley, 33, is Shell’s Technology Manager for Ferrari, attending all the grands prix with the storied Italian F1 team. She has been working for Shell for 12 years, ever since graduating from Sheffield University in England. She then spent five years carrying out fundamental research into combustion chemistry, which she used as the basis for her PhD. She joined the F1 program in 2005 and is now responsible for managing the interaction between Shell and Ferrari, which includes overseeing a lab that is brought to each and every F1 race. Executive Editor Mark Gillies caught up with her at the U.S. Grand Prix at Indianapolis in June.

Q: What are the differences between Shell’s Ferrari racing fuel and pump gas?

Lilley: The F1 fuel has to be made of the same types of components you would find in pump gas, it’s just that the ratios are played around with. All of our fuels are manufactured in Chester, England, where Shell has a big technology center—and next door we have a refinery. All the components come straight from the refinery and are the same component streams as we use in European fuel, which is of a higher quality than you would find in the U.S. American fuel probably wouldn’t work very well in an F1 car.

Q: So what octane do you run?

Lilley: The classification is from 95 to 102 RON, which might not mean too much to U.S. readers, but you can extrapolate. [That's about 90 to 97 octane in the U.S.]

Q: One assumes you would always run 102 octane, then?

Mark Gillies Talks to Shell's Technology Manager Lisa Lilley About Formula1 Racing Fuel - Feature - Auto Reviews - Car and Driver

Lilley: No, not really. Most people associate octane with power, but some octane has anti-knock properties, preventing pre-ignition. When you have a car revving at over 18,000 rpm, the fuel composition is a little different, so we are not normally on the upper limit for octane. Depending on Ferrari’s strategy, if they asked for 102 octane, we would give it to them, but normally we are not there.

Q: Shell actually makes 102 octane racing fuel. Is that any different to F1 fuel?

L illey: I think they are very different, but I don’t know exactly; such fuels don’t have to follow any real regulations—unlike in F1, where the FIA lays down the fuel specification—so you can play around with them a little bit more freely.

Q: What would happen if you put 110 octane racing fuel into an F1 engine?

Lilley: I think any gains would be minimal actually, because the engine is designed differently. Octane is not something we generally optimize on. For us, it’s very important to have the volatility profile and the right kind of power components.

 

Article source: http://www.caranddriver.com/features/07q3/mark_gillies_talks_to_shell_s_technology_manager_lisa_lilley_about_formula1_racing_fuel-feature

Geneva motor show: Audi RS3 Sportback

trade-in values | Posted by Belov
Aug 25 2011
Geneva motor show: Audi RS3 Sportback

Audi has officially unveiled the RS3 Sportback at the Geneva show – the first car in the A3 range to inherit the manufacturer’s ultimate performance badge.

The new model, which receives its public debut in Switzerland, will be the flagship for the five-door Sportback line-up and with 335bhp on tap it easily outpaces its closest competitors in the mega-hatch turf war.

Gallery: Geneva Motor Show 2011

Thanks to the 2.5-litre five-cylinder turbocharged engine borrowed from the Audi TT-RS, the Sportback will rocket to 62mph in 4.6 seconds – making it every bit as quick as a V8-powered R8.

Looking for an Audi? Search with Auto Trader

Order a car brochure from a range of manufacturers and book a test-drive here

As with all performance-bred Audis the RS3 gets permanent four-wheel drive courtesy of the manufacturer’s Quattro system, as well as a heavily modified suspension set up which sees the car sit 25mm lower than standard on a wider track.

Judicious use of carbon fibre-reinforced plastics at key locations in order to save weight means that the RS3 comes in at a relatively light 1540kg, ensuring a strong power-to-weight ratio.

Geneva motor show: Audi RS3 Sportback

The five-pot engine is mated to the seven-speed S tronic dual-clutch gearbox which includes a launch control system for explosive off-the-line performance.

Audi claims the car will still be capable of 31mpg. That target may be tough to meet as the signature rhythm of its powerplant is amplified by a sound flap in the exhaust which is connected to the Sport button found in the cabin.

Also inside is a black leather interior with silver contrast stitching and the usual flat-bottomed RS steering wheel. Expect to find plenty of RS badges around the place, too.

Outside the Sportback gains flared arches, cills and air intakes, as well as a high-gloss black diffuser and a large roof spoiler.

The range-topping RS3 is already available to order now and comes with a f39,900 price tag in the UK next month. Deliveries are expected to start in April.

Video of the RS3 Sportback at Geneva can be found here.

Gallery: Geneva Motor Show 2011

Geneva motor show: Audi RS3 Sportback

Looking for an Audi? Search with Auto Trader

Order a car brochure from a range of manufacturers and book a test-drive here

Source: http://uk.autoblog.com/2011/03/01/geneva-motor-show-audi-rs3-sportback/

Geneva Motor Show 2011 Highlights with GTspirit.com


2011 Aston Martin V12 Vantage – Comparison Tests – Car and Driver

trade-in values | Posted by Belov
Jul 20 2011

2011 Aston Martin V12 Vantage  - Comparison Tests - Car and Driver

It’s an oversimplification to characterize this car as a mere engine swap, but that’s the essence of the V-12 Vantage. Bolting in the 5.9-liter V-12 increases curb weight by about 150 pounds, to 3738; puts a little more of the car’s mass on the front axle (52.6 percent versus 49.4); and reduces its 0-to-60-mph time to 4.2, 0-to-100 to 9.2, and the quarter-mile to 12.5 at 117.

Those are pretty serious stats, ones that slightly upstage the flagship DBS; plus, the V-12 Vantage wears the supercar mantle more comfortably than does the V-8 model. However, the V-12 is only a tenth quicker to 60 mph, and two-tenths quicker in the quarter-mile, than the last V-8 Vantage we tested. And the Aston trails the Audi by a half-second across the board—the Ferrari, the Porsche, and the Mercedes by considerably more. At 140 mph, the other cars have all become little dots up ahead on the horizon.

The story was the same in most other areas of performance evaluation. The Aston’s chassis was as good as any in terms of rigidity, and its steering drew positive reviews, particularly for on-center feel. But the Aston’s transient responses aren’t super crisp. Sure, 67.8 mph is a swift lane-change speed, but the other cars all snaked through at more than 70 mph. And in our High Sierra frolic, the Vantage sometimes had to work hard to keep pace.

2011 Aston Martin V12 Vantage  - Comparison Tests - Car and Driver

The exception to the foregoing was the braking test. Equipped with carbon-ceramic rotors and sticky Pirelli P Zero Corsas, the Aston went from 70 mph to all-stop in 156 feet, tying the best-in-test Audi.

Assessed as a place to be while the miles whistle past, the Aston fared well, thanks to gorgeous interior materials and dcor, plus seats that were as supportive as any, and more comfortable than most.

We were also pleased that the Vantage comes only with a manual gearbox, one of two so equipped in the test, although this exposed one of two ergonomic demerits. The high center console made hasty shifting awkward—our Reno-Fernley lap king peeled a little chunk out of his elbow with one upshift. And the car’s high cowl limited forward sightlines.

2011 Aston Martin V12 Vantage  - Comparison Tests - Car and Driver

Distinguished from the V-8 Vantage by its louvered hood—they’re functional, by the way—the Aston’s classic styling drew appreciative stares from passersby (when it wasn’t being upstaged by the Ferrari). And the yowl of the V-12 as it climbed toward redline triggered primal pleasure receptors in our brains.

But in this group, the Aston scores as the V-8 Vantage did back in our 2007 comparo: “an 8/10ths car in a 10/10ths game.”

 

Article source: http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/comparisons/10q3/v12_vantage_vs._r8_v10_458_italia_sls_amg_911_turbo_s-comparison_tests/2011_aston_martin_v12_vantage_page_2

2006 Jaguar Super V-8 vs. 2007 M-B S550, 2006 Audi A8L, 2007 Lexus LS460L, 2006 BMW 750Li – Comparison Tests

trade-in values | Posted by Belov
Jul 07 2011
2006 Jaguar Super V-8 vs. 2007 M-B S550, 2006 Audi A8L, 2007 Lexus LS460L, 2006 BMW 750Li - Comparison Tests

If you’re in the market for one of the long-wheelbase versions of sports-luxury sedans in the $80,000-to-$100,000 range, then you’re probably a big-city businessman or -woman who needs a car in which you often sit in the rear while being driven to work or play.

Why else pay the premium for all that extra back-seat space? Not for the kids to run amok in, surely, or for the Great Pyrenees dog to stretch out in. Nope, these cars are desirable not only because they’re roomy and luxurious in the rear-passenger compartment but also because they are satisfying to drive when you have the car to yourself.

And the model choice is creamy rich. Newest among these bourgeois buggies is the Lexus LS460L, flagship of the company’s fourth-generation LS range and first-ever long-wheelbase model. Lexus threw everything it knows about luxury at this car, including optional air springs, variable-gear-ratio steering, a premium airline-like right rear seat with power ottoman and multifunctional massage, advanced parking guidance, and an integrated 30-gig hard drive that not only speeds up the navigation system but also stores music and videos.

Powering all this extravagance is a 380-hp V-8 with an eight-speed automatic transmission. Of course, you have to check some options boxes to get all the features mentioned here, but you get the picture.

For a sense of how well the Lexus fulfills its luxury promise, we lined up the obvious suspects. Audi’s A8L is an incontrovertible competitor, armed as it is with an oversize leather-and-wood-lined rear-passenger compartment. For 2007, the A8 has a new direct-injection 4.2-liter V-8 with 350 horsepower; unfortunately, only a 2006 with the 40-valve, 335-hp V-8 was available for this test. So keep in mind that the specification, performance, and pricing information are for the 2006 A8L. Expect the ’07 car to be a smidge quicker and cost about $1000 more. The Audi brings with it the advantages of four-wheel drive and competitive pricing. But despite all-aluminum body construction, the Audi weighs within a couple hundred pounds of the heaviest contender.

2006 Jaguar Super V-8 vs. 2007 M-B S550, 2006 Audi A8L, 2007 Lexus LS460L, 2006 BMW 750Li - Comparison Tests

Jaguar’s Super V-8 long-wheelbase version of its XJR also boasts aluminum construction, but in this case the light metal is used to better effect, and the car tips the truck scales at Schick Moving & Storage at just over two tons — the lightest car here. Adding a supercharger helps tote that load, too, giving the long Jag a distinctive theoretical power-to-weight advantage in this group.

And no group would be complete without a BMW. It just so happens that the company makes a long version of its 7-series bruiser — the 750Li — complete with thundering 4.8-liter V-8 and the traditional athletic chassis to go with it. You get a sense of BMW’s priorities when you read that the 750Li is equipped standard with 20-way power-adjustable "comfort" front seats. Always thinking about the driver, those guys.

Rounding out the group is the Mercedes-Benz S550, which is not a special long-wheelbase model. It just comes with a generous wheelbase and a ton of rear-seat legroom, somehow without looking freakishly long. Powered by a new-generation four-cam V-8 that drives through a seven-speed transmission, the S550 we requested also wore the company’s Airmatic springs with adaptive damping and active roll control, promising good ride and handling balance.

Thus equipped, we put the cars through our usual battery of tests to see what would shake out. And yes, we also remembered to spend a little time in the back seat.

 

Article source: http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/comparisons/07q1/2006_jaguar_super_v-8_vs._2007_m-b_s550_2006_audi_a8l_2007_lexus_ls460l_2006_bmw_750li-comparison_tests